This beautiful sketch, discovered last year, is the last-known self-portrait by Michael Dahl (1659 – 1743), painted in the 1720s, when Dahl was in his 60s. It shows the grand old man of British painting looking back on thirty years as a Court painter, at a date when he was beginning to retire. Perhaps it is also a meditation on the death of his friend and rival Sir Godfrey Kneller in 1723, since the broad, loaded brushwork of the face carries a hint of Kneller’s style.
Portrait of Cardinal Thomas Wolsey (1470/71 – 1530). Judging from its technique and provenance – there is a wax seal verso with the arms of the Capponi family of Florence – this small panel portrait of Cardinal Wolsey may have been painted in Italy, suggesting that an original likeness could have been sent there by one of the Cardinal’s Italian contacts during his lifetime.
Thomas Gainsborough RA (1727 – 1788) Portrait of a young woman in a green dress c.1742. This portrait was painted when the artist was about 15 years old, and it shows that Gainsborough was a painter of unique brilliance right from the beginning. Included in Hugh Belsey’s forthcoming Catalogue Raisonné of the portraits of Thomas Gainsborough. (Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art 2019 Vol II p.901 no.975)
This painting by John Closterman (1660 – 1711) has an excellent claim to be one of two lost self-portraits. It has been dated to c.1690, when Closterman was emerging from his partnership with John Riley. Quoting the pictorial rhetoric of Kneller’s self-portraits, the sitter presents himself as a rival talent. The broad, sketchy handling is distinct from Closterman’s commissioned works, suggesting that Closterman painted it for himself, or for a connoisseur friend.
Thomas Hudson (1701 – 1779) St Mary Magdalen c.1725, probably a portrait of the artist’s wife Mary Richardson, daughter of Jonathan Richardson his apprentice-master. This is Hudson’s very earliest work, previously known only from an engraving by John Faber published 1725 – 27. (Exhibited York House, Twickenham 2015 – 2016).
Charles Almand (fl.?1777 – 1783), Portrait of Solomon Brigden (1760 – 1825) 1783, Carter at Knole. Identified as one of the missing portraits from a set of the entire staff at Knole commissioned from Charles Almand by the 3rd Duke of Dorset. Still numbered on the back in the Steward’s handwriting, who recorded the name of each sitter in his ledger, and the date they entered the Duke’s service..
(c) Private Collection.
Sir Godfrey Kneller Bt (1646 – 1723), Portrait of a Gentleman 1690s, signed GK. This portrait, recently conserved and restored to its original oval, shows Kneller at his most psychologically penetrating. The sitter is unidentified, but the informal presentation recalls Kneller’s portraits of art world friends at this date, such as the engraver Peter Vandrebanc. Private Collection.
Anglo-Netherlandish School c.1575 Judith and Holofernes, an Allegory of Queen Elizabeth I and Spain. A rare surviving example of Sixteenth Century popular art. Acquired by the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust
Mary Beale (1633 – 1699) Two sketches of the artist’s son Bartholomew Beale (1656 – 1709) c.1660. Acquired by Tate Britain and exhibited as part of the ‘Walk Through British Art’
Attributed to Mary Beale (1633 – 1699) after John Riley (1646 – 1691) Portrait of Secretary Sir William Coventry MP (c.1628 – 1686) Statesman and Commissioner for the Navy . Acquired by the Palace of Westminster
Mary Beale (1633 – 1699) Portrait of George Savile Marquess of Halifax PC FRS (1633 – 1695) c.1674 – 76, Lord Privy Seal, statesman and writer. Acquired by the Palace of Westminster through Lawrence Steigrad Fine Art, New York
John William Waterhouse (1847 – 1917) Study for The Enchanted Garden in the Lady Lever Collection, Liverpool 1916. (Private Collection)
Marcus Gheeraerts the younger (c.1561/2 – 1636) Portrait of a gentleman c.1605 Private Collection. This painting is extremely rare in Gheeraerts’s male portraiture for showing the sitter smiling. Our sitter’s air of wit and easy informality suggests an artist or writer rather than an aristocrat, as does the way in which he is looking upwards at the viewer. His long hair, revealed after the removal of later overpaint, might place him in the patronage circle of the Earl of Southampton.
Francis Hayman RA (1708 – 1776) Unique life-scale self portrait sketch c.1730 – 35. (Philip Mould & Co.)
Richard van Bleeck (1670 – after 1747) Portrait of Thomas Howard 8th Duke of Norfolk Earl Marshal (1683 – 1732) c.1725, acquired by a Private Collection. This portrait is an autograph kit-cat replica of the life-size full-length in the collection at Burton Constable in Yorshire.
Hieronimo Custodis (d.1593) Portrait of Field Marshal Sir William Pelham Lord Justice of Ireland (1527 – 1587) c.1587
William Aikman (1682 – 1731) Portrait of Sir Gilbert Elliot of Minto 1st Lord Minto (1693 – 1766), acquired by the Scottish National Portrait Gallery. One of Aikman’s dispersed set of portraits of the Edinburgh Club of Worthies, whose members included Allan Ramsay senior (1686 – 1758), poet, playwright, publisher, and wig-maker, and father of the famous portraitist.
Mary Beale (1633 – 1699) rare small-scale portraits of the 2nd Earl and Countess of Shaftesbury c.1674. Private Collection
Sixteenth Century English School, Portrait of King Richard III, dated by dendrochronology to c.1585. Private Collection. An early corridor portrait revealed after the removal of Victorian overpaint.
Willem Wissing (1656 – 1687) Portrait of a Lady c.1680, Private Collection
Michael Dahl (1659 – 1743) Portrait of a Lady c.1710, Private Collection
Follower of (?Workshop of) Joachim Beuckelaer (c.1530 – after 1574) Fishmarket with a scene of the Miraculous Draft of Fishes in the background; bears signature, monogram and dated 1568, but dendrochronology gives c.1595. One of several versions of this composition on large panels of similar size and date, such as the painting on loan to the Bonnenfantenmuseum, Maastricht. Beuckelaer’s original version is unknown, but his work became very popular in the years after his death. The highly competent but harder version of Beuckelaer’s technique might suggest a painter who had been in Beuckelaer’s studio. The painting of the fish is outstanding.